Mr. C & the CG version of the Supermarket Stare 1
In an interview with Ward Jenkins, Oscar winner John Canemaker offered the following quote:
"John: I’m biased, of course, toward drawing, but it does seem to me the more layers of “reality” you strip away in animation, the more soul is revealed. It’s a paradox. When ultra-real CGI goes in for extreme close-ups of fuzzy animals, I start to count the hairs on their fur. And that distracts me from the narrative. Story is the most important element of the process, not the tools used to tell it, and...well, now I‘m getting away from the story I was telling you."
I'm not going to jump on my computer-generated high horse over this - there's no need. If I did that every time I would soon get some sort of repetitive strain injury and besides, all opinions are valid here at RedVan Enterprises Inc. With that said, I am curious as to why any viewer would react to digitally-made imagery this way. After all, we see live-action close-ups all the time in film and television, so what is it that is throwing Mr. Canemaker (and others) out of the animated world of the CG picture? Is it the computer-made equivalent of the "Supermarket Stare" we all get when out shopping? Is it just preference or signature style?
There also seems be a little contradiction in John's last couple of sentences, but I wanted to put this up before offering some thoughts on anything. That'll come in a subsequent post.
...
PS. Go and read Ward's interview about the Oscar stuff - it's really interesting. (Part 2 has the above quote, just so ya know).
There also seems be a little contradiction in John's last couple of sentences, but I wanted to put this up before offering some thoughts on anything. That'll come in a subsequent post.
...
PS. Go and read Ward's interview about the Oscar stuff - it's really interesting. (Part 2 has the above quote, just so ya know).






